Limington Planning Board Minutes
Home   www.Limington.org
<--Prev       Index       Next-->


TOWN OF LIMINGTON
PLANNING BOARD MEETING
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 AT 7:00 P.M.
LIMINGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING

AGENDA

1.CALL TO ORDER

2.REVIEW OF APLLICATION BY SUSANNA ADAMS
TEACHING AND SELLING ARTS AND CRAFTS AND
MUSIC

3.PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION BY OLIVIA DAICY
FOR A JUNKYARD

4.APPLICATION BY EDWARD AND LISA SMITH
TO OPERATE A HAIR SALON AT THEIR HOME

5.OLD BUSINESS

6.NEW BUSINESS

7.ADJOURNMENT


These minutes were approved at the October 26, 2000 Planning Board meeting with the following changes:

Page 3, paragraph 3 - Ron Perkins stated that he had spoken to Jim Libby after the August 24, 2000 meeting he attended. Mr. Perkins said that if the Board .........


TOWN OF LIMINGTON

PLANNING BOARD MINUTES

The meeting was called to order by Wendy Walker, Chairperson, at 7:00 P.M. on September 28, 2000 at the Limington Municipal Building.

Members present: Wendy Walker, Chairperson; Kreg Rose, Vice-Chairperson; Stanley Blake, Jr.; Raymond Coffin; Diane Hubbard; Harold Jordan.

Alternate members present: Ron Perkins.

Also attending: Priscilla Tucker, Secretary; Freeman Abbott, C.E.O.

The meeting was videotaped by Richard Jarrett.

The first order of business was the approval of the Minutes of the August 24, 2000 meeting.

Stanley Blake, Jr. made the following motion:

MOTION: To approve the Minutes of the August 24,2000 meeting of the Planning Board.

The motion was seconded by Kreg Rose and carried unanimously.

The next order of business was the Public Hearing of the application by Edward and Lisa Smith to operate a hair salon in their home at 196 Hardscrabble Road in Limington.

Wendy Walker questioned where the parking was going to be located. Mrs. Smith explained that they have a fifty foot double driveway, twenty-seven feet wide. She did not feel there would be any parking problem. She added that she would have only two clients at a time. The house is already built and is not in a sub-division and is not near a body of water.

The Board then reviewed the Performance Standards, General Requirements, Article VII in the Zoning Ordinance. As a result the following Findings of Fact shall be included on the Notice of Decision:

1.
A beauty shop requires four (4) parking spaces per chair.
2.
The applicant anticipates only two (2) clients at a time.
3.
The shop will be located in the rural district and, therefore, the sign cannot be lighted. The size can only be twenty (20) square feet (ten (10) feet on each side).
4.
The site distance was verified.


Planning Board Minutes
September 28, 2000 Meeting
Page 2

Article IX Section 9.7.G.1, items a through n were reviewed. There were no actions necessary.

Harold Jordan made the following motion:

MOTION: To approve the application submitted by Edward and Lisa Smith with the conditions.

The motion was seconded by Diane Hubbard and carried unanimously.

Olivia Daicy was not present for her Public Hearing. No action was taken on her application for a junkyard.

Mike Harmon came into the meeting and requested that the Board hear him. He was irate because he had received a letter from the Town C.E.O. closing his business down. Mr. Harmon had appeared before the Board earlier 'in the year and was told to provide proof that he was open during the previous year. He did not provide the Town with the information.

Wendy Walker told Mr. Harmon he was supposed to provide the information to the Town and this would have prevented the action taken by the C.E.O.

Mr. Harmon provided receipts that proved he was open for business during 1999.

Freeman Abbott, C.E.O. said that Mr. Harmon was operating a Junkyard. Mr. Harmon said be has about a dozen vehicles in the yard. He said he received permits in 1987 from the Town but there are no records from that period.

Stanley Blake asked Freeman Abbott if the permits have to be renewed annually. Freeman Abbott answered that the permits must be renewed each year.

Ron Perkins stated that, one, Mr. Harmon proved he was in business and two, that he has the right to make a living but the matter must be cleared up legally according to the Zoning Ordinance.

Wendy Walker informed Mr. Harmon that he needs to apply for a junkyard permit. The fee of $150 he paid earlier this year can be used for the application for junkyard.

Mr. Harmon said that he will submit the application for a junkyard permit.


Planning Board Minutes
September 28, 2000 Meeting
Page 3

The Webster Mills Place application was not addressed. A letter from Pierce, Atwood, attorneys, regarding the application was received today and will be distributed to the members of the Board.

Wendy Walker recommended that the Board prepare an explanation of their consideration of the application from Webster Mills Place as soon as possible.

Ron Perkins stated that he had spoken to Jim Libby after the meeting [correction: after the August 24, 2000 meeting] he attended. Mr. Libby said [correction: Mr. Perkins said] that if the Board refused the Webster Mills application because it did not agree with the Comprehensive Plan, and it doesn't, he would not support the application.

Wendy Walker said she would contact the Town Attorney, Jim Haddow and discuss the issue with him.

The remainder of the meeting addressed the Planning Board's proposed modifications to the Zoning Ordinance (see attached).

Kreg Rose made the following motion:

MOTION: To adjourn the September 28,2000 meeting of the Planning Board.

The motion was seconded by Raymond Coffin and carried unanimously.

The meeting adjourned at 10:00 P.M.

Return to top of page



PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE TOWN OF LIMINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE - OCTOBER, 2000

SECTIONORIGINALPROPOSED CHANGE
6.3.B
(Add to Note B)
Dimensional standards for commercial/industrial uses in the commercial district will be established on a case-by-case basis by the Limington Planning Board to achieve full effective use of the district area while assuring public convenience and safety and protecting valuable town resources. Under no circumstances shall a lot be less than 1.5 acres. In cases where the C.E.O. has the authority to issue a permit the setbacks may be approved by the C.E.O. as long as the setbacks are at least equal to those in the rural district.
7.1.B
(Change and addition)
No building permit shall be issued to erect a structure which is located more than 100 feet from a public or private road unless an access road meeting the construction standards of Section 7.1.A has been constructed. No building permit shall be issued to erect a structure which is located more than 500 feet from a public or private road unless an access road meeting the construction standards of Section 7.1.A has been constructed.
7.10.B
(Add to B)
Private roads constructed after the effective date of this ordinance to provide access to permitted uses shall meet or exceed the Town's road construction standards for slope, preparation, sub-base (as specified in the Town's subdivision review standards)
1.
Any access roads serving more than three (3) dwelling units shall be at least twenty (20) feet wide.
1.
Serving two (2) dwelling units shall be Fifteen (15) feet wide.
6.2 LAND USE TABLE - NUMBER 16B
6.3 (Change)
RCRURE/VC
Multi-Family DwellingNPBPBCO
RCRURE/VC
Multi-Family DwellingNCOCOCO


Zoning Ordinance
Page 2

SECTIONORIGINALPROPOSED CHANGE
6.2 Land Use Table
(Add)
RCRURE/VC
Wireless Communication FacilitiesPBPBPBPB
6.3 Dimensional Requirements
(Add)
Lots and structures in all districts shall meet or exceed the following minimum requirements. Height requirements do not apply to flagpoles, chimneys, transmission towers, steeples, windmills or similar structures usually erected at a greater height than the principal building, however such accessory structures or appurtenances require a lot line setback distance of no less than its height. Lots and structures in all districts shall meet or exceed the following minimum requirements. Height requirements do not apply to flagpoles, chimneys, transmission towers, steeples, windmills or similar structures usually erected at a greater height than the principal building, however such accessory structures or appurtenances require a lot line setback distance of no less than its height. Communications towers require a lot line setback (distance of one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the height of the tower.


Zoning Ordinance
Page 3

SECTIONORIGINALPROPOSED CHANGE
7.13.B.2 No free-standing signs shall be permitted.
(Add to B2)
Free-standing business signs shall be permitted in connection with any legal business or industry and shall meet the following requirements,
a.
For individual business establishments a maximum of one (1) double exposed face sign shall be permitted. Total sign area for double sided sign (2 exposed faces) shall not exceed fifty (50) feet, single sided sign (1 exposed face) shall not exceed twenty-five (25) square feet.
b.
Maximum height for individual business signs shall not exceed twelve (12) feet.
c.
For multi-establishment businesses, such as shopping centers or office complexes, a maximum of one (1) directory sign (2 exposed faces) with the total of two exposed faces not top exceed (75) feet in size, plus one (1) identification sign for each business within the complex not to exceed twenty-four (24) square feet in size shall be permitted on the directory sign.
d.
Maximum height for multi-business signs shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet.
e.
Setback from the center of the road will be a minimum of thirty-three (33) feet.
f.
The total sign area shall not exceed ninety (90) square feet for a single sided sign and one hundred eighty (180) square feet for a two sided sign in its aggregate,
g.
A free-standing sign shall not impair a driver's normal sight distance.
h.
All signs shall be maintained in good condition and repair.
i.
The primary purpose of the above referenced signs shall identification.


Zoning Ordinance
Page 4

SECTIONORIGINALPROPOSED CHANGE
SECTION 8.8.A.1
(Change)
The removal, or transfer of less than thirty (30) cubic yards of material from or onto any lot in any twelve month period. The removal or transfer of one hundred (100) cubic yards of material from or onto any lot in any twelve month period.
SECTION 8.19
Wireless Telecommunications Facilities
(Add Section)
A. Design Criteria
The tower shall be a free-standing monopole design. Lattice style towers and similar facilities requiring three or more legs and/or guy wires for support are not allowed unless the Board determines that a monopole is not suitable for the location and that the best interest of the Town will be served by the construction of a lattice style tower.
1.
Carrier Capacity: Wireless telecommunications towers shall be designed to accommodate multiple carriers, The intent of this requirement is to reduce the number of facilities which will be required to be located within the community.
2.
Finish/Paint: The tower shall be designed to diminish visual impact.
3.
Fencing: Fencing shall be provided to control access to wireless telecommunication facilities. There shall be no razor wire used, unless it is requested by the Town Fire Chief and/or local police authority.
4.
Lighting of towers shall be prohibited unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration, Lighting shall be limited to that needed for emergencies and/or as required by the FAA.
B. Setbacks
The tower shall be set back from all property lines a distance equal to one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of its height.


Zoning Ordinance
Page 5

SECTIONORIGINALPROPOSED CHANGE
C. Application Criteria
1. Engineering Justification: Applications for wireless telecommunications facilities shall include engineering justification for the need, location and height.

D. Co-location

1.
Wherever possible, wireless telecommunications equipment installations shall be placed on existing monopoles, towers, tanks, roofs, signs, or other existing manmade or natural features to make the equipment inconspicuous.

2.
Co-location shall be maximized and new wireless telecommunications facilities shall be minimized. New facilities shall only be considered after a finding that existing or previously approved facilities cannot reasonably provide an agreement to cooperate with co-location of additional carriers at industry standard rates.

E. Bond
The Planning Board shall require the applicant to post a bond acceptable to the Town in an amount sufficient to pay the cost for the removal of the facility. Wireless telecommunications facilities which have been abandoned for a period of twelve (12) consecutive months shall be removed.


Zoning Ordinance
Page 6

SECTIONORIGINALPROPOSED CHANGE
8.20 Miscellaneous
(Add)
A, No travel trailer, recreational vehicle ("RV") or similar vehicle may be used as a dwelling unit for more than one hundred twenty (120) days in any twelve (12) month period.

B. A day is defined as any part of a day.


Zoning Ordinance
Page 7

SECTIONORIGINALPROPOSED CHANGE
2.2 Definitions
(New)
ANTENNA: A device for transmitting and/or receiving electromagnetic waves, which is attached to a tower or other structure.
CO-LOCATION: Locating wireless communications equipment from more than one provider on a single site.
DRIVEWAY: A driveway is a vehicular access to one or two private lots.
FREE-STANDING SIGN: A self-supporting sign not attached to any building, wall, or fence, but in a fixed location. This does not include portable or trailer type signs.
PORTABLE SIGNS: A sign standing on, rather than fixed to, the ground. Such signs are usually, but not necessarily, supported from the ground by one (1) or more poles or posts or similar uprights with or without braces, including benches and A or sandwich boards.
Sign: A display surface, fabric or device containing organized and related elements (letters, pictures, products, or sculptures) composed to form a single unit, designed to convey information visually and which is exposed to public view. In cases where matter is displayed in a random or unconnected manner without an organized relationship, each such component shall constitute a sign. SIGN: Any structure, display, logo, device or representation which is designed or used to advertise or call attention to any item, business, activity or place and is visible from outside a building, It does not include the flag, pennant or insignia of any nation, state or town.
SIGN AREA: Total sign area shall be the aggregate of all exposed faces.


Zoning Ordinance
Page 8

SECTIONORIGINALPROPOSED CHANGE
2.2 Definitions TEMPORARY SIGN: Any sign erected, affixed or maintained on a premises for a short, fixed period of time including portable and/or mobile signs such as sandwich boards and signs on trailers. For purposes of measuring length of time a temporary sign is displayed, use of a sign for any length of time in a twenty-four (24) hour period shall constitute a day.


Minor Streets

Return to top of page


Please note that www.Limington.org is not the official website of the Government of the Town of Limington.